Can Men and Women be 'Just Friends'?

I thought I’d just throw this one in for good measure.  I’ve been working at a new company I haven’t worked with before this week and inevitably, this question came up when I was chatting with the girlies in my team ... Can men and women ever be just friends?


I think it’s a fantastic debate which I tend to have quite a lot with lots of different people.  When I say can men and women be just ‘friends’ I don’t mean acquaintances eg people in work, or people who you say hello to at the gym, I mean people of the opposite sex friends (I’m not including if one or both are gay here – definitely different rules apply there) who you go out with regularly for dinner, cinema, shopping etc with whom you have no sexual relationship.

I used to think it was possible, however, on two occasions in the last couple of years, men who I’ve known for a loooooong time and who I thought were perfectly clear that there would never be a ‘partner’ type relationship – in fact I’ve gone as far as to say “we will NEVER be partners” to both of them, have actually at some point over stepped that mark.  Before that happened, I would have always said, “Yes of course they can be friends.  My best friend is a man” however, I’m now coming to the conclusion that it’s a definite ‘No’.

I have one female friend who always maintains that men and women can NEVER truly be just friends as one is always more attracted to the other, even though they may not say so, or even may not always be fully aware of it.  I have to admit, that the more I see and the more I debate this with people, it seems to be true.

What do you think; do you think men and women can be friends without one being more attracted and deep down wanting more?

On another subject and just to have a minor moan, this month, I have to pay for my car service, gas and electricity bill, broken washing machine and to top it all, I need a new boiler!  How the hell does all that stuff come in one month?!  Beats me … just thought I’d throw that one in there.  Oh, and some other news ... I'm on-line dating again, so watch out for the updates.  We're in for some more fun or another bumpy ride!  Until next time lovelies, be fabulous.

Jo

Flight & Warm Bodies

 

OK, last two film reviews for now...

 

Flight ***** (5 Stars)

I really wasn’t expected much from this film.  I’d read some reviews and they said it was good, but even though I review films, I don’t hold much store by those written by others – I’ve seen films that were slated that I loved and vice versa,  I think ‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder’ and films are really subjective.  This film however, I really loved.

So what was it about?  A seasoned airline pilot (Denzel Washington), miraculously crash lands his plane after a mid-air catastrophe, saving all but 7 of the crew and passengers.  After the crash, he is hailed as a hero, but as more is learned, more questions than answers arise as to who or what was really at fault and what really happened on the plane.

The story follows Denzel and his struggle to come to terms with what happened and his drink problem.  It was thoroughly enjoyable and keeps you entertained from beginning to end.  Definitely worth a watch, it’s my must see film of the week.  Here’s the trailer …
 

 

 

Warm Bodies * (1 Star)

Well, what can I say?  This may have reached 2 Stars if I hadn’t been so put off by sharing a cinema theatre with about 150 teenagers.  Firstly, I’m going to have a bit of a rant about that.  Not having any kids, I was immediately struck by how unruly 13-15 year olds are when there is no authority figure there to keep them in check.  I don’t care who you are or how well behaved you think your teen is when you’re not there, but I’m telling you, they aren’t! 

I can’t recall ever being in that situation before, but I was completely amazed at the showing off, the shouting, giggling, talking, phones on/phones off, throwing stuff, food rustling and general rowdiness of the kids in that theatre.  In my observations, kids under the age of 13 don’t act like that and teenagers over the age of 16 don’t act like that, so what is it that makes that age group so mental?

Is it because it’s probably one of the first opportunities they get to test out their independence without a parent or teacher being present?  Whatever it is, I suggest you parents have a word with your teen (even if you don’t think this doesn’t relate to your 13-15 year old, I’m telling you it does - there wasn’t one child in there that didn’t misbehave, even if only in minor way).

Right, rant over, humbug … on to the film.  After a zombie epidemic, a zombie encounters a human survivor and well, falls in love with her.  She sees that he is a bit different from the other zombies and they form a special relationship.  As the film goes on, he starts to become more and more human (ahhhh that’s what love does for you … or that’s what the film producers would have you think … it’s not like that in my experience!).

I guess it wasn’t that bad, in fact, if I’d been able to go in the day, mid-week, it may have even reached a 3 star status, but we’ll never know.  Note to self: Don’t EVER go and see a teen pic on a Saturday afternoon ever again.  The mahoosive ice-cream was good though!  Here’s the trailer …
 

 

 

Right, that’s it for another episode, there are another new batch of great looking films out in the next couple of weeks, so that'll keep me busy for a while!  Until then, be fabulous!

Lots of love

Jx

Lincoln, Bullet to the Head, I Give it a Year

Again, not much to report really.  I’ve been incredibly quiet lately, that’s going to need to change soon, I’m getting a bit bored.  I know that at Champagne Saturday is on the cards pretty soon, so that’s something to look forward to, I also don’t have any holidays planned which is something I’m going to have to sort out soon!

So, back to the ole’ faithful film reviews.  Again, I’ve seen a few over the last few weeks, so let’s get stuck in …

Lincoln * (1 star)

I’ve got to be honest; this was the dullest film I think I’ve ever seen.  Now, don’t get me wrong, the acting was brilliant.  Daniel Day Lewis definitely deserved to win the BAFTA for it and he’ll have been robbed if he doesn’t receive the Oscar and Sally Fields as his wife as also fabulous, I just found the content and story EXTREMELY boring.  In fact, I can’t even remember watching a more boring film – I think I snoozed a few times too.  I guess if you’re into American history, then it would be slightly entertaining, but I just found it dreary, dreary, dreary.  The story is based around the time of the American Civil War when Abraham Lincoln was attempting to abolish slavery and win the war against the South.  Here’s the crux … he wins.  There you go; you don’t need to see it now!  Here’s the trailer just in case my review didn’t put you off enough!

 

Bullet to the Head ** (2 Stars)

This is the new Sylvester Stallone film.  It’s only been on at cinemas for a couple of weeks, but I think it may have gone off now … it doesn’t surprise me, I think it should have gone straight to DVD.  It was a typical Stallone film (he really is getting too old for this action s**t now – honestly, a man in his 70s is never going to win a fight against a buff twenty something!).  Here’s the premise: Career hit man Jimmy Bob enters into an unlikely alliance with a detective, Taylor Kwon, to bring down the ruthless killer of their respective partners.

I have to be honest (as you would expect) but the guy who played Kwon has to be THE worst actor I’ve seen in a long time.  It was amateurish and truly cringe worthy to watch him.  The story was full of awful cliché’s and was only mildly entertaining.  See it on DVD if you must.  Here’s the trailer …

 

 I Give It a Year **** (4 Stars)

I actually found this quite entertaining for a typical Rom Com.  More so than I expected (although that could be something to do with the fact that Simon Baker – him from The Mentalist – was starring in it … I love him).  Here’s the story: a couple meet, fall in love and get married within 7 months.  Their friends and family are really not convinced that they are right for each other and trouble ensues due to his ex-girlfriend still hanging around and her having to deal with a new, rather dishy client.

It was all really typical rom-com stuff, but I really did quite enjoy it (which was quite a shock!).  Here’s the trailer.

Right, that’s it for me today lovelies.  Tomorrow, I’ll review Flight and Warm Bodies.  Until then, be fabulous.

Lots of love

Jx

Django Unchained, Les Miserables, Gangster Squad

Hello lovelies.  Well again, not much going on (well, actually there’s been quite a bit ,but not stuff I can share at the moment) so I’ll stick with the film reviews for now.  Sorry to be a bit cryptic, but needs must.

I’ve seen another 3 films since my last post, Django Unchanged, Gangster Squad, Les Miserables.  So let’s get going...

Les Miserables *** (3 Stars)

I would have given it more if not for the absolutely shockingly bad performance from Russell Crowe!  But I’ll back up a bit.  Firstly, I’ve never seen the stage show; in fact, I think the only song that I’ve really heard from it is that one that Susan Boyle sang on her X Factor audition!  I’m not going to go into the story here, because I believe that most people know it (not that I did before I saw the film, but hey ho).  The cinematography was amazing.  The sets were fabulous, it was beautifully and majestically (now there’s a word) shot and it was actually quite over awing. 

Hugh Jackman was brilliant and looked so authentic at the beginning of the film as a down trodden con who’d been imprisoned for 19 years – brilliant, he was brilliant.  Anne Hathaway was extraordinary as Fantine and I was actually shocked at how wonderful her singing was (wish I could say the same for all the actors).  The scenes where she’s thrown out of her job and turns to prostitution are staggering.  She was amazing.  If she doesn’t win an Oscar for that, I’d be shocked.

Where it fell down terribly for me was bloody Russell Crowe.  It was shocking.  Just shocking.  He cannot sing and he made me cringe every time he came on screen.  I can still hear his awful voice in my head now and I saw it over a week ago!  I also thought it was too long and got quite bored in parts.  Now I’m sure people will be booing me while they’re reading this, but it simply wasn’t as moving as I expected it to be.  Apart from the bits with Anne Hatherway in (which were pretty much all brilliant) it was a very mediocre film for me. 

Would I see it again?  No, probably not!  Would I recommend it?  Suppose so, just for the experience.  In case you’ve been living in a cave, here’s the trailer.

 

 

Gangster Squad ***** (4.5 stars)

I really enjoyed this film and I couldn’t believe it when it was panned by the critics.  I really liked it (then again, I’ve always been partial to a good gangster film).  The story is about a gang of cops that band together (in secret) to get rid of a Jewish Underworld Boss who was trying to take over LA.  They do it in secret because most of the force are being paid off by this boss and his henchmen, so they had to act in secret without the ‘authorities’ knowing about it and stopping them.

As I say, I thoroughly enjoyed it and would have given it 5 stars but for the awful performance from Sean Penn.  Who on earth thought he could carry that role must have been bonkers.  Also, he seemed to have some sort of prosthetics covering his face that were totally unrealistic and a real distraction for me (if they weren’t prosthetics, then he’s starting to look very scary as he ages!).

If you like gangster films and don’t mind a period drama with lots of violence, then it’s definitely worth a watch and would I watch it again?  Yeah, probably.  Here’s the trailer...

 

Django Unchained ***** (5 stars)

This is, without doubt, THE best film I’ve seen in ages.  I’d give it more than 5 out of 5 if I could!  It’s the latest offering from Quentin Tarantino and I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed it.  I did think it was strange at one point, that it seemed to be lacking Tarantino’s usual violence, however, I did speak (or rather think) a bit too soon and it did get VERY bloody towards the end. 

Anyway, the story ... Django is a slave whose brutal history with his former owners lands him face to face with a German born bounty hunter.  The two band together when Django agrees to point out 3 fugitives that the bounty hunter is searching for.  In return, the bounty hunter agrees to help Django rescue his wife from her slave owners.

It’s a long film (2 hrs 46 minutes) but is action packed every step of the way.  It had a wonderful story, with lots of twists and turns.  I loved it and highly recommend it (that’s if you don’t mind violence and lots of blood that is!).  Would I watch it again, definitely.  Here’s the trailer.... Go see it, you’ll love it!
 

Right lovelies, that’s me for another day.  Until next time, be fabulous!

Lots of love

Jx

Quartet - Playing for Keeps

OK, last two films...

Quartet ** (2/5)

I really was looking forward to this.  A stellar cast full of some of the UK’s best veteran actors and was directed by Dustin Hoffman, however, I found it really quite condescending and trite – the acting was as good as you would expect and they did their best with a rather dreadful screenplay.  Such a shame, because it could have been brilliant.  Either that, or it was definitely more suited to the ‘older’ (even older than me) generation, more my mum’s age.  In fact, my mum would love it, which is probably why I didn't!

The story was about aging actors who live together in a home and all still think they’re wonderful (my mum did amateur dramatics all the way through my childhood and I absolutely hated watching it in front and back stage, seeing all the backbiting, backstabbing, prima-donna behaviour that went on ... it turns my stomach when I think about even now all those years later, so much so that I couldn’t go and watch a play, even a professional one if you paid me ... I’ve been ruined for life!).

So sadly, it really reminded me of that, which is probably why I had such an adverse reaction to it.  That and I recognised some of my mum’s acting ‘pals’ in there too *shudder* - some of whom were talking far too loudly and obnoxiously.

Anyway, I’d better move on, because I’m getting a bit agitated!

Playing for Keeps *** (3/5)

This had such awful reviews that I really wasn’t expecting much and I have to say that it didn’t set my world on fire, but it was what it said on the box, a bog standard romcom.

It’s about a down on his luck former football star (Gerard Butler) returns home (he lives in the US) to put his life back together.  Looking for a way to rebuild his relationship with his son, he gets roped into coaching the boy’s football team.  But his attempts to finally become an adult and impress his ex-wife are met with challenges from the ‘soccer moms’ who pursue him every chance they get.

If you’re bored and seen everything else or really love romcoms, then it’s worth seeing otherwise, save it for DVD.  Here’s the trailer.

 

There are some wonderful films coming up that I’m really looking forward to.  Most notable are, Les Miserables, Gangster Squad and Django Unchained.  They’ve all had wonderful reviews and I’m really looking forward to them.  I’ve also discovered the wonders of Baskin Robins ice cream (which isn’t good for my waistline especially since my diet’s been going so well) but I absolutely can’t resist their Cherry and Turkish Delight flavours – OMG, so yummy!

Right lovelies, that’s it for another day, more soon.  Until then, be fabulous.

Lots of love

Jx

Life of Pi, Parental Guidance, Seven Psychopaths

OK, so more film reviews.  Let’s get straight to it (before they go off the cinema!)

Life of Pi ***** (4.5/5)

I loved this film and really would probably have been a 5 only for the fact that it was about half an hour too long for me.  There was at least half an hour during the middle of the film that could have been taken out and would not have affected the plot in any way.  Having said that, I did really enjoy it. 

The cinematography was amazing and the special effects were fabulous, but it was the story that was really enjoyable with the most amazing twist at the end (don’t worry, I won’t tell you what that is).  So what’s it about? Well, the family of a 16 year old Indian boy decide to relocate their Zoo (yes, Zoo) to Canada.  However, during the sea journey their freighter was shipwrecked.  He ends up on a make shift raft with an orang-utan, a zebra, a hyena and a Bengal tiger.  The film follows his trials and tribulations in trying to keep himself and others alive!

I LOVED it!  Go see it.  It’s beautiful.  Here’s the trailer – you may have already seen it but even so, it’s worth seeing again...

 

Parental Guidance * (1/5)

“OMG – shoot me now” was the saying that kept floating through my head during this one.  Dreadful.  Awful.  Appalling.  I actually couldn’t believe quite how bad this was.  It stars Bette Midler and Billy Crystal (so you’d think it would at least be passable) who play the grandparents of three children whose parents ask them to babysit whilst they go on holiday for a few days.  Two worlds collide when the grandparents try to use their old school parenting skills on new age kids (well, that’s what they gumph says anyway).

Load of bloody rubbish.  Lame gags, unnecessary slapstick and totally unrealistic, set up scenarios.  Dreadful, dreadful film, watch it at your peril!  (No trailer because I couldn’t do that to you)

Seven Psychopaths **** (4/5)

I really enjoyed this film.  I won’t go into it too much because I think it’s gone off the cinema now (which is a shame because I really recommend it ... catch it on DVD – I nearly typed video! – you won’t be disappointed).  It’s about a struggling screenwriter, Colin Farrell, who inadvertently becomes entangled in the LA criminal underworld after his oddball friends kidnap a gangster’s beloved Shih Tzu.

It’s hilarious with a fabulous cast (including Christopher Walken, Sam Rockwell, and Wood Harrelson – the gangster), screenplay and storylines.  It’s definitely worth a watch.  It’s very different to a lot of films I’ve seen recently.

Right lovelies, more tomorrow.  Until then, be fabulous!

Lots of love

Jx

The Hobbit - Jack Reacher - The Impossible

Well lovelies, what can I say?  It’s certainly been a while and for that I must apologise.  I’ve had so much going on in my personal/work life (I wish I could tell you, but that wouldn’t be right ... a bit too serious) that writing has been decidedly secondary.

Firstly, let me wish you a Happy New Year ... hope you had a good one and your Christmas was better than mine.  It was the worst ever ... and culminated in me having beans on toast on my own on Christmas day ... don’t ask ... it’s too awful. 

Anyway, onward and upward, it’s a New Year and a new start for me ... hopefully.  I’ve already embarked upon the diet and I’ve lost 4 lbs this week which I’ve done the old fashioned way ie 1000 calories a day and plenty of exercise.  I’m not sure how long I’ll keep up the 1000 calories for, but I’m giving it a good go.

Secondly, let me say another huge THANK YOU – even though I haven’t posted for ages, I’ve still managed to go over the 8000 hits mark!  That’s incredible.  Thank you so much.  You guys ROCK!

Right, so what can I tell you about?  Films ... lots and lots of films.  Pretty much the only thing I’ve been up to lately.  So, what films have I seen since my last post?

The Hobbit

The Impossible

Jack Reacher

Life of Pi

Parental Guidance

Quartet

Seven Psychopaths

Playing for Keeps

 

So, let’s start with ...

 
The Hobbit – **** (4 out of 5 stars)

(I’ve added scoring now!  How advanced of me!) Well, I did enjoy it.  It was a little long and if you don’t like the Lord of the Rings films, then you won’t like this, but all in all it was really good.  The CGI was amazing as were the sets – there’s not really much more to say because you pretty much know what you’re going to get if you’ve seen the previous films.  Definitely worth a watch ... I’d even see it again!  I won’t add a trailer as I’ve already done so in other posts.

The Impossible ***** (5/5)

Loved it, best film I’ve seen this year (well, it is only the 6 January!).  So much better than I was expecting – it kept me on the edge of my seat pretty much all the way through and I cried like a baby (dunno if that’s because I’m more emotional than normal at the moment but hey ho!).

The story is a true one based on a family who were caught in Thailand during the awful tsunami of Christmas in - I think it was – 2004.  As they relax around the pool on Boxing Day a huge wall of black water races across the hotel grounds towards them.  The film then follows what happens to each of them.  It was gripping and really rather moving I have to say!  I thoroughly enjoyed it, but needed a lie down afterwards to recover.  Here’s the trailer...

 

Jack Reacher  *** (3/5)

Well, those who read these posts regularly will know that I’m not a fan of Titchy Tom – he just isn’t credible as an action hero for me ... he’s simply too small.  Because we know what size he is, you can tell when he’s standing next to someone whether he’s on a box or not.  I saw him interviewed about this film on The Graham Norton Show and his co-star Rosamund Pike (?) towered above him, so I was a bit distracted during the film, watching for the ‘box’ shots.

Anyway, I digress ... The story is about a gunman who shoots down five people in a seemingly random shooting.  Under interrogation, the suspect won’t say anything but just hands over a note saying ‘Get Jack Reacher’ and that’s where our Tom comes in.  He has to uncover what really happened which opens a whole bag frogs.  I can’t really say more because there are quite a few twists and I don’t want to spoil it.

I think that I may have been a little tight on the scoring for this one – it was quite entertaining, just not really my thing ... it was more of a ‘boy’ film, you know, all guns and everyone running, but it’s certainly worth a watch.

Right lovelies, that’s it for me today.  I’ll review the others over the next couple of days.  Until then, be fabulous!

Lots of love

Jx